3 ms·
I'm still getting to know Git, and I appreciate articles like this as they touch on approaches to Git that have benefits in the real world, but I can't help but
by ZenoArrow 10y ago
I'm still getting to know Git, and I appreciate articles like this as they touch on approaches to Git that have benefits in the real world, but I can't help but feel that version control tools should be simpler.
Does anyone have any experience with version control tools that have worked out simpler to use than Git? I've heard good things about Darcs before (aside from its performance issues, which projects like Pijul are designed to address), are there any other tools that are worth investigating?
- pfranz 10y agoIt depends what you're using it for. Many people use Windows every day without knowing things like how to remap a network drive--but it's nice to have it there when you need it. If you're by yourself and just need to keep a linear history all you need is 'git init' 'git add' and 'git commit'--if that's all you ever need, svn or any version control should work about equally well. But if you do need remote repositories, branches, rewriting your history, or commit hooks, it's there waiting if you're using git. I feel like most of the different version control systems differ on those advanced features or how it scales for special needs. Git is great for decentralized and remote work, Perforce is better at handling histories with large binary files, etc. The basic features are fairly similar between them. Maybe there's a gui you like or a specific workflow, but I feel like that's a subjective choice.
- throwaway_exer 10y agoWhat you want is svn.