4 ms·
Perhaps, but it made sense with 16MB RAM and 486 CPU. Current implementation uses 31 multiplier which is useless over 1M entries. This problem is also in Arrays
by jkot 10y ago
Perhaps, but it made sense with 16MB RAM and 486 CPU. Current implementation uses 31 multiplier which is useless over 1M entries. This problem is also in Arrays.hash*() and many other places.