3 ms·
30 concurrent connections is a very low number, compared to uses of MySQL/InnoDB at real scale. What happens at higher numbers? I am not arguing that "concurre
by evanelias 10y ago
30 concurrent connections is a very low number, compared to uses of MySQL/InnoDB at real scale. What happens at higher numbers?
I am not arguing that "concurrent = fast". My point is real systems have a higher level of concurrency as a baseline.
InnoDB supports granular concurrent access because real workloads need this. Systems that have poor stories around concurrency -- MyISAM, Redis, pre-WiredTiger MongoDB -- definitely hit real scalability issues under high-volume workloads.