5 ms·
Yeah, the article was completely pointless. Question some friends and I were discussing today: if this issue were to go to court, what grounds would Adobe have?
by kleinsch 17y ago
Yeah, the article was completely pointless. Question some friends and I were discussing today: if this issue were to go to court, what grounds would Adobe have?
- sjs382 17y ago331 is an anti-competitive policy. They are using their position in one market to affect another. Then again, they aren't a monopoly so...
- TallGuyShort 17y agoI agree with sjs382 - I'm pretty sure they could argue that this violates the Sherman Act - an attempt to gain market power by something other than pure product-awesomeness and low prices. I really think a lawsuit is plausible - I just don't think this guy has sufficient grounds for such a headline.