Mahmud... what? The article was essentially saying that Apple can do whatever they want because they built it. The main point of the article was pretty disparag

Mahmud... what? The article was essentially saying that Apple can do whatever they want because they built it. The main point of the article was pretty disparaging to people who are upset by this decision. If I didn't convey that I was upset by this as well, that is my mistake. I thought that by pointing out that the author was, again in my opinion, mistaken in his argument I was in fact on the side of people who 'demand the right to hack, and contribute back' Never said I was tired of people here discussing things. I am tired of what the author was saying which I didn't believe to be well thought out and, frankly, pseudo-intellectual snobbery despite its strong historical basis. Having just read the article a second time I thought I was abundantly clear, but I figured I should clarify.