> This would probably get them fired in certain companies with responsible information policies. Sure, but if people followed the rules, almost no work would g

> This would probably get them fired in certain companies with responsible information policies. Sure, but if people followed the rules, almost no work would get done. (In the UK, "working to rule" is a form of industrial action that's only a little short of a strike.) > Which is wrong as naive in the first place. Yeah, more than 1.6 billion people are naive and wrong. > Facebook stands for social manipulation advertising. Pick your poison. How does that work, then? Otherwise, there's an ethical difference between sharing information voluntarily, for their own benefit -- which people do on Facebook -- and Google's clandestine tracking, which is for Google's benefit.