5 ms·

You've ploughed over 100 hours into even though it "sucks" and you want it to be patched so it's "not terrible" anymore? Seems like a lot of time to dedicated

• youdontknowtho 10y ago
  Don't get me wrong, for what it is, if you don't think about the price...it's kind of cool. Since a good glass of scotch can cost more than a game...sure why not. EDIT: Also, at the length of a comment grows the probability of hyperbole being cranked up approaches 1.
  • qplex 10y ago
    I think it is sort of hard to asses the "true value" of a game, but I do agree with you that No Man's Sky is No Where Close of being worth $60 in comparison to other games.
• crispyambulance 10y ago
  yep, 100 hours ?! ...and for perspective, it has been less than 2 months since release date in early August. That is a HUGE investment of time. I like the game (although I certainly haven't put 100 hours into it), it has some true innovation but its a friggin' game. How much can one expect from a computer game? You play it for a while until you get bored and then quit. 100+ hours of gameplay for $60 seems like a smashing success to me. I mean, how much time would a "great" game use up? Are we in South Park Territory (... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Love,_Not_Warcraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Love,_Not_Warcraft)?? I get the feeling HG was forced to release it too early-- probably by pushy "project management professionals." Someday we may hear the juicy details of what happened.
  • qplex 10y ago
    That is still under 2 hours per day. Not that much in my books, especially if you do not watch TV or play other games...