5 ms·
Wow. I really wanted this game to be amazing. Hell, I've played it over 100 hours, but that's mainly because I waited so long for it to come out. I have an 8x
by youdontknowtho 10y ago
Wow. I really wanted this game to be amazing. Hell, I've played it over 100 hours, but that's mainly because I waited so long for it to come out.
I have an 8x AMD with 32GB RAM and a Radeon 7970. Not a bad system. At 1080p it drops frames all the time. It freaks out at weird moments in game play. There is this weird tick where every alien that shows up at a space station will be the same alien. As I play it I really think about how if they hadn't hyped it, it would be fun...maybe not worth 60$...but it would be fun. I;m old. I guess I was hoping it would turn into the greatest Trade Wars 2002 ever. It's really not even close. As you move around the galaxy you really wonder sometimes...why the fsck am I doing this again? I've upgrade my person and ship to the point that they are almost indestructible to anything that I've met to this point. At first I did this alternate path through the game where you "follow the atlas"...you go through multiple solar systems chasing this thing and it gives you a shiny red orb every time that you catch up to it. Ok. Then at the last one it says..."hey, I'm the last one. Do you want to give me those stones and create a new star?"...Sure why not. You give it the stones and then it says...in text..."somewhere...out there...a new star was created. thanks for the stones dawg". That's it. I thought there would at least be a pre-rendered star-being-created animation. Nope. AND you don't have those shiny orbs anymore which were the most valuable things in the in-game economy.
At this point, I keep thinking that HG will release a patch that makes it not terrible. Seriously. I would settle for just bad at this point. I'm not like a lot of the Reddit crowd that wants to see Sean Murray hanged. I just think this was a huge wasted opportunity. If this had been a PC only game or an Xbox indie release it would have been amazing. Having to go the big time console release route made the hype really crazy. It showed, though, how intense the followers of an immersive universe sized space game would be if you could build something like a high quality 3D Trade Wars 2002.
But yeah...they should make it not suck at this point. I really try to not be critical of other people's creative work, but seriously. Make it not suck. (Some new music would be great too. I like it, but the sushi bar techno gets old after a while.)
EDIT: I hadn't watched those trailers again since the game came out. OH MY GOD. I forgot how amazing they were. There was more diversity in the first 3 minutes of that trailer than there was in 100 hours of gameplay. Jesus. Sean said in an interview that they were doing all of this generation on the client side and relying on the fact that planet creation was somehow idempotent for everyone to have the same experience. What I don't get is why, in 2016, would you even remotely try to do everything client side? As soon as someone jumps into a solar system that would be a trigger for a distributed job on a cluster to assist in generating the details. Those details would need to then be cached somewhere, but you wouldn't need to generate them again. After that some direction and story mechanics could steer people towards some pre-engineered experiences that would bring them together and drive the plot. Jesus Christ, this isn't rocket science anymore. There are text books with this stuff in it. They said "no loading screens"...I WISH THERE WERE. The stutter that the game has when transitioning between environments is worse than a loading screen.
I would have bought a new computer to play the game in those trailers. Man. What a waste.
- tommica 10y agoIf I recall correctly, I think some people had an issue with the game having nSync enabled by default, and that editing a config file to disable it helped them
- youdontknowtho 10y agoAhhh...I will try that when I get home. Cause, let's face it...I waited for two years to play the effing thing. I'm going to play it for a while more.
- ablation 10y agoYou've ploughed over 100 hours into even though it "sucks" and you want it to be patched so it's "not terrible" anymore? Seems like a lot of time to dedicated to something that you don't really like. Do you feel like you got value for money, given the amount of time you've spent playing it?
- youdontknowtho 10y agoDon't get me wrong, for what it is, if you don't think about the price...it's kind of cool. Since a good glass of scotch can cost more than a game...sure why not. EDIT: Also, at the length of a comment grows the probability of hyperbole being cranked up approaches 1.
- qplex 10y agoI think it is sort of hard to asses the "true value" of a game, but I do agree with you that No Man's Sky is No Where Close of being worth $60 in comparison to other games.
- crispyambulance 10y agoyep, 100 hours ?! ...and for perspective, it has been less than 2 months since release date in early August. That is a HUGE investment of time. I like the game (although I certainly haven't put 100 hours into it), it has some true innovation but its a friggin' game. How much can one expect from a computer game? You play it for a while until you get bored and then quit. 100+ hours of gameplay for $60 seems like a smashing success to me. I mean, how much time would a "great" game use up? Are we in South Park Territory (... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Love,_Not_Warcraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Love,_Not_Warcraft)?? I get the feeling HG was forced to release it too early-- probably by pushy "project management professionals." Someday we may hear the juicy details of what happened.