2 ms·
>you know what kind of facts are they may be omitting, or know where to look for opposing opinions. No, that's being lazy. If you follow that guideline you wou
by hueving 10y ago
>you know what kind of facts are they may be omitting, or know where to look for opposing opinions.
No, that's being lazy. If you follow that guideline you would only scrutinize things which fit into your preconceived notion of what the biases of the author would be. You should scrutinize everything rigorously. Just because someone is voting for Hillary doesn't give them free reign to say any negative thing they want about renewable energy since they "aren't biased that way".
- viraptor 10y agoNever said you shouldn't look in other directions. Sure, you can look in all the possible places. It's better if you do. But unless I'm going to write a report and spend a few hours/days doing a complete research, finding opposing views (and opposing views to those views) is a good approximation.