Let's assume all these assertions are correct i.e. the disappearance of every Google product would hurt more than the same scenario but sub Google -> Apple. Tha

Let's assume all these assertions are correct i.e. the disappearance of every Google product would hurt more than the same scenario but sub Google -> Apple. That doesn't actually imply that Google > Apple (in terms of general influence) in the world in which they both do exist. My interpretation of your post is that Google might be more _important_ than Apple. And my counterargument is that importance is not equivalent to influence.