2 ms·
But you stated that anything using LIDAR was not capable of robust tracking. Perhaps you meant that anything using LIDAR was doing so because camera-based track
by robotresearcher 10y ago
But you stated that anything using LIDAR was not capable of robust tracking. Perhaps you meant that anything using LIDAR was doing so because camera-based tracking is not very robust. But that's not the straightforward interpretation of your statement.
- phkahler 10y ago>> But that's not the straightforward interpretation of your statement. Yes, that would be a communication problem of mine. It's something I'm working on ;-) But I would counter that LIDAR isn't going to fully make up for the problems of the camera based system with the result being a simple sounding statement like "if they're using LIDAR it's not good enough", or grossly oversimplified to "LIDAR sucks". I will admit that LIDAR could conceivably enhance a really good vision system by offering better depth perception, but I don't believe that's why people are using it today.