3 ms·
How they handle them is far more important than if they handle them. Human drivers aren't exactly great at handling edge cases either, but they certainly handle
by saosebastiao 10y ago
How they handle them is far more important than if they handle them. Human drivers aren't exactly great at handling edge cases either, but they certainly handle them better than the computers do at the moment and for the near future. Existing technology is by far better at the non-edge cases, but nowhere enough to make up for how bad they are at edge cases. They have better reaction times for people crossing the street, but throw some snow at it and it'll drive off a cliff.
I'm sure they've got some reasonably safe behavior for when it doesn't know what to do (do nothing!), but that doesn't exactly make for a great transportation device. Staying home is safer than that and just as effective at not getting you anywhere.
And while edge cases are by definition rare, how rare are they? I'd be willing to estimate that when I drove trucks for a living, I'd handle upwards of 100 scenarios per day that were not "by the books". Remember that 99.9% of uptime still means you are having downtime 1.5 minutes a day. If they are really bad at handling the edge cases at the 0.1% level of rarity, that's still enough of a chance to fuck up at least once a day.
- enraged_camel 10y ago>>Human drivers aren't exactly great at handling edge cases either, but they certainly handle them better than the computers do at the moment and for the near future. Citation needed.
- saosebastiao 10y agohttp://motherboard.vice.com/read/robotics-lab-uber-gutted-says-driving-cars-are-not-even-close-carnegie-mellon-nrec http://motherboard.vice.com/read/robotics-lab-uber-gutted-sa...