3 ms·
Not sure I follow your orange juice / motor oil rebuttal but I'm going to focus on the more substantive portion of this interchange... It's purely a misconcept
by threepipeproblm 10y ago
Not sure I follow your orange juice / motor oil rebuttal but I'm going to focus on the more substantive portion of this interchange...
It's purely a misconception in the same way that 30% motor oil is pure orange juice -- which is to say, it's not a misconception, by my reading. I wonder what my IP laywer would say about it, will post if I decide to ask.
Unless I am looking at the wrong comment, @pluma's explanation is just that it's not a problem as long as you don't sue Facebook. But this is equivalent to saying that as long as you give up your only recourse in the event FB violates your IP, you'll be fine. To me it seems like a mentality that makes sense primarily if a person doesn't ever expect to do anything worth patenting, or doesn't ever plan on patenting for some other reason. Don't sell yourself short.
- cloverich 10y agoI definitely glossed over the patent issue a bit and appreciate the comment. > doesn't ever plan on patenting for some other reason I personally don't believe patents, outside of a few very special circumstances, should be allowed to exist. The idea that Facebook could copy one of my ideas and out-compete me based on their size is, imho, a perfectly reasonable thing for them to do. That being said, the current environment seems to demand that one patent any and everything they can as a pre-emptive defense. Hmm.