3 ms·
> you'd only have one binary with OpenSSL compiled in So then any process that wanted to use crypto etc. would have to call this binary? That just seems like
by Retr0spectrum 10y ago
> you'd only have one binary with OpenSSL compiled in
So then any process that wanted to use crypto etc. would have to call this binary?
That just seems like a very inefficient way if implementing dymanic linking...
- JdeBP 10y agoYou have the wrong metric. The metric should be the efficiency of the mechanism in implementing SSL. Now look at things like Gerrit Pape's sslio , http://smarden.org/ipsvd/sslio.8.html http://smarden.org/ipsvd/sslio.8.html . Note that the subject at hand purportedly uses several of Gerrit Pape's other tools.