3 ms·
I can't see how end users could be possibly empowered to analyze the IT security risks of off-the-shelf IoT devices, before buying them. There are already safe
by ge0rg 10y ago
I can't see how end users could be possibly empowered to analyze the IT security risks of off-the-shelf IoT devices, before buying them.
There are already safety standards and according mandatory certification processes in place that (should) prevent electric appliances from burning down your house (CE) or from bringing down airplanes (FCC).
What is (urgently) needed is a similar approach to mandatory IT security certification for IoT devices. This is also advocated by Bruce Schneier [0]:
Security engineers are working on technologies that can mitigate much of this risk, but many solutions won't be deployed without government involvement. This is not something that the market can solve. Like data privacy, the risks and solutions are too technical for most people and organizations to understand; companies are motivated to hide the insecurity of their own systems from their customers, their users, and the public [...]
[0] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/07/real-world_secu.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/07/real-world_se...
- icebraining 10y agoI can't see how end users could be possibly empowered to analyze the IT security risks of off-the-shelf IoT devices, before buying them. The same way they do for everything else. Ask experts. Demand third-party reviews. Require warranties for security flaws.
- di4na 10y agoWant an answer? The real one? Let corporations attack each other via electronic attack. It will be far worse at the beginning. But once you really threaten the bottom line for free, security will come. I sadly see no other good way to have security in software.
- eternalban 10y agohttp://www.ul.com/newsroom/pressreleases/ul-launches-cybersecurity-assurance-program/ http://www.ul.com/newsroom/pressreleases/ul-launches-cyberse...