3 ms·
A peptide is already a polymer. This is basic definitional stuff: >"peptides fall under the broad chemical classes of biological oligomers and polymers" https:
by nonbel 10y ago
A peptide is already a polymer. This is basic definitional stuff:
>"peptides fall under the broad chemical classes of biological oligomers and polymers"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide
Really the people doing the research have responsibility to speak out against this kind of jargon loading hype... Oh I see it is the title they chose for their own paper. I didn't read the paper, but the presence of hyping activities meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator has proven itself a decent heuristic so I won't bother.
Also, pretty much every bacteria is "multi-drug resistant".
- VygmraMGVl 10y agoThese are peptides bound to a polymer particle that is not made out of peptides, but out of another polymer (PAMAM). The vast majority of easily cultured bacteria have demonstrated the ability to acquire multi-drug resistance over time, but that doesn't mean that most bacteria that currently exist are multi-drug resistant.
- nonbel 10y agoI don't see how this is a correction of what I wrote. It is completely usual for a peptide to not only be a polymer itself, but also be attached to other polymers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycosylation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycosylation That term is totally meaningless in the title. Similarly, the term "multi-drug resistance" has always been about hyping up your paper. It was used until 2010 or so without any definition at all, look at all those papers: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=multi+drug+resistant https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=multi+drug+resista...