4 ms·
I tried to do the same thing but bought a cheap <$100 mono laser. I pretty much never print, maybe a page a month, if that. It's only a year old and now it won
by brokenmachine 10y ago
I tried to do the same thing but bought a cheap <$100 mono laser. I pretty much never print, maybe a page a month, if that.
It's only a year old and now it won't suck up the paper properly. I have to literally stick my hands into it and feed the paper in page-by-page.
The thing has successfully printed less than 20 pages and it's already not working.
It's 2016 and Samsung can't make a rubber roller that works. And I don't want to buy another just to have the same thing happen.
- wvenable 10y agoI spent about $400 -- I figure a sub $100 laser printer is much the same thing as buying a cheap inkjet.
- brokenmachine 10y agoI wrongfully assumed that an appliance manufactured and sold to perform a single task would be able to perform that task. That was a mistake.
- wvenable 10y agoI think this whole thread is about how that's a mistake! You get what you pay for and cheap printers are crap; they're so cheap they're virtually useless.