5 ms·
Even if 1 or 2 tried for real, it's still an indication of...something. The amount of logic thought that needed to NOT occur for thinking this makes sense is s
by tonteldoos 10y ago
Even if 1 or 2 tried for real, it's still an indication of...something. The amount of logic thought that needed to NOT occur for thinking this makes sense is staggering.
- randyrand 10y agoMight also be 0.
- tonteldoos 10y agoTrue. I wouldn't put my money on it though. People who have actually done it (and failed) may be embarrassed enough to not advertise it.
- tpeo 10y agoI get that you're probably using the word in a more popular sense, but I don't see what "logic" has to do with this. Correct inference has to start off from somewhere. If a person had literally no idea of what they were doing, they wouldn't be able to judge whether it's doable or not either. Teaching a kid logic wouldn't prevent him from believing Santa Claus was real, but teaching how implausible is it for someone to circle the globe on flying reindeer visiting every single child's house during a single day might. I find it hard to believe that there are people actually drilling their iPhones, though. I mean, no matter how clueless they are, they could've still googled it, right?
- Shorel 10y agoMonkey sees, monkey does. Hard to go against some million years of evolutive heritage. At least one person has to try (so the rest can laugh about it)