7 ms·
If you read the article you'll see that they made that assumption because they wanted a conservative estimate of the population and that's the minimum possible
by amock 17y ago
If you read the article you'll see that they made that assumption because they wanted a conservative estimate of the population and that's the minimum possible number for a successful species.
- mortenjorck 17y agoIs two really the minimum for a successful species? For the next generation to reproduce, it will have to resort to either incest (dangerously similar genetics) or interspecies mating (dangerously different genetics). Then again, I'm not a biologist, so maybe one can correct me here.