3 ms·
If you take a course in energy conversion, and also an economics course, then you would consider this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_aircraft h
by etwigg 10y ago
If you take a course in energy conversion, and also an economics course, then you would consider this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_aircraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_aircraft
Some joules are more expensive than others :)
- nickff 10y agoThe nuclear aircraft did not fail because nuclear power was too expensive, they failed because reactors were too heavy. If you read more about the American nuclear aircraft programs, you will find that they were most interested in using the heat from Nuclear reactions to warm up air; they did not propose to generate electricity with which to heat or push air (because it is too complex and inefficient).
- vitus 10y agoRight. A nuclear reactor generates massive amounts of heat from fission, then uses that heat to boil water (sometimes heavy water for better radiation shielding) to make steam to cause turbines to spin, which generates the electricity. (in fact, fossil fuel burning plants also use this steam-electric model) If the end goal is to generate heat, then there's no good reason to add those additional steps.