I don't see how their approach contradicts "traditional biology". Sure, they are concentrating on one of the many aspects of human biology but as long as their

I don't see how their approach contradicts "traditional biology". Sure, they are concentrating on one of the many aspects of human biology but as long as their findings are mere recommendations to get tested more often etc based on the potential genetic predisposition I don't see anything wrong with that. As far as the article is concerned - I'd be very cautious going into the "share your dna report with your employer" (or anyone else for that matter) territory for a variety of reasons.