5 ms·
Obviously I'm older, but I'd prefer to pay a little more, and give you some profit, for a printer that's built to last, with some metal, rather than <£100 for a
by anexprogrammer 10y ago
Obviously I'm older, but I'd prefer to pay a little more, and give you some profit, for a printer that's built to last, with some metal, rather than <£100 for a near cost pile of fragile plastic as the foundation of my ink subscription - with ink cartridges that seem to get smaller but more expensive with each passing year.
Then pay a reasonable price for cartridge with printhead ongoing, otherwise, if I'm successful keeping the printer as long as possible, I'm still recouping the low cost of the printer long past the point I bought enough ink to do so.
I don't need high throughput, heavy duty, as I don't print that much any more, so buying from the business range isn't usually sensible.
- wvenable 10y agoI bought a color laser printer for a few hundred bucks and despite almost never having to print anything it's one of the better purchases I've made. It just works. It's not wasteful. And it won't dry out from lack of use. I figure I'll break even over buying ink-jet printers and cartridges in another year or so. Even if everything costs more in short term, it's so much less wasteful.
- EvanAnderson 10y agoSame here. Purchased a workgroup color laser almost 7 years ago. My printing volume is fairly low (around 500 pages / year) and I'm still on the original set of cartridges. The amortized cost of this printer has been amazing-- under $75 / year. It uses the PCL protocol and has an Ethernet connection, so it's a long way off from practical obsolescence, too. I'll likely be using this printer in another 7 years.
- intrasight 10y agoDon't new color laser printers use cartridges? They just have toner instead of ink.
- wvenable 10y agoYeah they do. But they don't dry out which is one of the big reasons every time I had to print I needed a new cartridge.
- brokenmachine 10y agoI tried to do the same thing but bought a cheap <$100 mono laser. I pretty much never print, maybe a page a month, if that. It's only a year old and now it won't suck up the paper properly. I have to literally stick my hands into it and feed the paper in page-by-page. The thing has successfully printed less than 20 pages and it's already not working. It's 2016 and Samsung can't make a rubber roller that works. And I don't want to buy another just to have the same thing happen.
- wvenable 10y agoI spent about $400 -- I figure a sub $100 laser printer is much the same thing as buying a cheap inkjet.
- brokenmachine 10y agoI wrongfully assumed that an appliance manufactured and sold to perform a single task would be able to perform that task. That was a mistake.
- wvenable 10y agoI think this whole thread is about how that's a mistake! You get what you pay for and cheap printers are crap; they're so cheap they're virtually useless.
- initram 10y agoI'm mostly in the same boat as you. However, I have found that with electronics, you run the risk of your beloved older piece of equipment not even being able to connect to your newer equipment because it doesn't have the latest connector (SCSI, Firewire, USB-2, USB-3, USB-C, Thunderbolt, Lightning, VGA, XGA, DVI, Mini-Display Port, HDMI, composite, component, etc.). On top of that, you have the issue of drivers and apps that can talk to the thing, too. Not as bad in the case of a printer, but still an issue for many devices.
- reitanqild 10y agoUSB 1,2 and three has been backwards compatible. Ethernet is. Most WiFi gear is. For most video equipment there exist some kind of adapters.
- jlgaddis 10y agoI worked at a .edu for years and we had several of those old, early LaserJets that worked for years, spitting out hundreds of thousands -- even millions, in a few cases -- of printed pages, with nothing more than the occasional change of toner cartridge.
- sperglord 10y agoThose laserjets don't have print heads like an inkjet printer does.