2 ms·
This looks to be a great tool, a creative writer's dream. I'd like to see a terms of use statement, a privacy statement, and some controls as to what's private
by drallison 17y ago
This looks to be a great tool, a creative writer's dream.
I'd like to see a terms of use statement, a privacy statement, and some controls as to what's private (ought to be the default) and what's open (everything private is fine). Using google and/or twitter creds is nice for the weak of memory, but it means revealing username and passwords for those sites, which in many users eyes is a security breech. It would be nice if you had a username/password for the site itself so that the paranoid can indulge in application isolation.
I suspect you'll get lots of people suggesting enhancements but, if I were you, I'd reject them. What's nice is the total simplicity and the daily reminder.
- grandalf 17y agothanks for the great comments. I will add the privacy policy info, etc. The google auth is completely secure (a feature via app engine) but I think the twitter auth could be secured a bit more. Interesting idea about adding a username/password option for the site itself.