4 ms·
That doesn't seem as good as Wire. Why should I bother with Signal? https://wire.com/ https://wire.com/
by mei0Iesh 10y ago
That doesn't seem as good as Wire. Why should I bother with Signal?
https://wire.com/ https://wire.com/
- 58028641 10y agoSignal has been reviewed by more people. Snowden recommends it.
- mi100hael 10y agoI think the better question is why should I bother with Wire? It's all of 3 months old, (and iOS is already on 2.0? Really?) Signal has been around for a few years now and uses a well-respected ratcheting encryption library similar to OTR. It's been well-audited and widely-adopted. It's already the de facto standard for FOSS E2E mobile messaging.
- tdkl 10y agoWire has launched in 2014 with emphasis on encrypted calls, it was only recently open sourced. It also ticks many boxes, only it's not decentralised and the server ain't open source (yet).
- tagrun 10y agoSignal/TextSecure was released in 2014. Can you be specific about the "many boxes" you're referring to? The most relevant to the grandparent being: has it ever been audited?
- mei0Iesh 10y agoThey seem more friendly and open than the Signal guys. They're using similar encryption, go check out their GitHub for more info. It doesn't require a phone number and has multi-device encryption with desktop support. It has audio, video, pictures, sketching, likes, editing, deleting, groups, and more. Signal feels like a joke in comparison. Try it.
- oakwhiz 10y agoWire is basically using the Signal protocol.