3 ms·
Right. I am saying that auditing the process is significantly more onerous on all parties than auditing the result, especially when it looks like the jurisprud
by h4nkoslo 10y ago
Right. I am saying that auditing the process is significantly more onerous on all parties than auditing the result, especially when it looks like the jurisprudence around the former is a complete clusterfuck that only exists so the feds can non-transparently and non-equitably mandate the latter anyway.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> only exists so the feds can non-transparently and non-equitably mandate the latter anyway. This premise is unsupported and, I would argue, completely unsupportable. Though I suppose if you start with the premise that the government is trying to mandate particular outcomes, the enforcement actions they take probably look like the target is capriciously moving, but that's just because the premise is incorrect.