> it is an anti-democratic currency I guess that's true, but that's because there's no commons that needs to be regulated. You don't need to vote on Bitcoin be

> it is an anti-democratic currency I guess that's true, but that's because there's no commons that needs to be regulated. You don't need to vote on Bitcoin because anyone can just do whatever they want with it. Your neighbor's use of it has zero effect on you. If you don't like it, you can just ignore it and use some other currency, crypto- or not-. It's similar to spoons. Spoons aren't democratic. No one can vote to ensure that your spoons must be a certain way. Spoons are just a thing you can choose to participate in or not. I wouldn't exactly call that anti-democratic so much as there's-no-need-to-vote-because-there's-no-commons.