5 ms·

You have been the victim of the conservative spin machine if you think one of the most experienced candidates that either party has fielded in decades isn't "co

You have been the victim of the conservative spin machine if you think one of the most experienced candidates that either party has fielded in decades isn't "competent".

lintiness 10y ago
let me guess, romney was "too robotic" and "didn't stand for anything" ... ?
- hellogoodbyeeee 10y ago
  I don't see how my opinion of Romney's personality has any bearing on Clinton's resume.
  - lintiness 10y ago
    of course you don't. romney's probably the single most experienced, best qualified candidate for president the nation's ever seen. that you believe a woman who's ridden the coattails of her husband to office is somehow more "experienced" is telling.
    - hellogoodbyeeee 10y ago
      Is this a joke? You are completely dismissing the accomplishments of a senator and a secretary of state because she is a woman? Lots of governors run for president. Very few senator/sec of state/first ladies do. Edit: Mitt Romney wasn't even a two term Governor. Gary Johnson is objectively a better qualified candidate
      - oh_sigh 10y ago
        If being president/CEO of a large organization is your qualifying factor, then you surely must be supporting Trump right now.
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
toomuchtodo 10y ago
Victim? Conservative spin machine? I watched Hillary and her operatives steam roll over Bernie Sanders in the Primary, and her lies are simply too much. To let her win the presidency would be a validation of her methods. She's a neoliberal who is just as bad as Obama (if not worse!) when it comes to military policy, US entitlements, environmental policy, trade policy, and so on. No thank you. I'll take the moron first.
oh_sigh 10y ago
If the DNC was as neutral during the primaries as they should have been, do you think Hillary would still be the nominee? Maybe, but there is a much better chance Bernie would have made it through. I say this as a person who has voted in the past 4 presidential elections, but never for a Dem or Repub.

You have been the victim of the conservative spin machine if you think one of the most experienced candidates that either party has fielded in decades isn't "competent".

lintiness 10y ago

let me guess, romney was "too robotic" and "didn't stand for anything" ... ?

hellogoodbyeeee 10y ago
I don't see how my opinion of Romney's personality has any bearing on Clinton's resume.
- lintiness 10y ago
  of course you don't. romney's probably the single most experienced, best qualified candidate for president the nation's ever seen. that you believe a woman who's ridden the coattails of her husband to office is somehow more "experienced" is telling.
  - hellogoodbyeeee 10y ago
    Is this a joke? You are completely dismissing the accomplishments of a senator and a secretary of state because she is a woman? Lots of governors run for president. Very few senator/sec of state/first ladies do. Edit: Mitt Romney wasn't even a two term Governor. Gary Johnson is objectively a better qualified candidate
    - oh_sigh 10y ago
      If being president/CEO of a large organization is your qualifying factor, then you surely must be supporting Trump right now.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]

toomuchtodo 10y ago

Victim? Conservative spin machine? I watched Hillary and her operatives steam roll over Bernie Sanders in the Primary, and her lies are simply too much. To let her win the presidency would be a validation of her methods. She's a neoliberal who is just as bad as Obama (if not worse!) when it comes to military policy, US entitlements, environmental policy, trade policy, and so on. No thank you. I'll take the moron first.

oh_sigh 10y ago

If the DNC was as neutral during the primaries as they should have been, do you think Hillary would still be the nominee? Maybe, but there is a much better chance Bernie would have made it through. I say this as a person who has voted in the past 4 presidential elections, but never for a Dem or Repub.