3 ms·
Sorry but that is just not true, Firefox has miserable DOM performance that results in laggyness, freezes on pages that work fine with Chrome. Until the Firefox
by verroq 10y ago
Sorry but that is just not true, Firefox has miserable DOM performance that results in laggyness, freezes on pages that work fine with Chrome. Until the Firefox people accept that their browser sucks can they finally try to make it better.
There is no sandboxing (in the works for how many years now?), their pdfjs is not as fast as the chrome native plugin, they force me to use the insecure and terribe flash plugin that crashes every time, one frozen tab still freezes the entire browser.
No I don't want to use Chrom{e,ium}. I wasn't tricked into choosing google. I just want something that works.
- carussell 10y ago> they force me to use the insecure and terribe flash plugin that crashes every time You mean Adobe's terrible plugin. It's a totally black box. Mozilla has nothing to do with the plugin development.
- michaelmrose 10y agoIf pages lag or freeze it might be the developers fault. I realize some are providing complex app like experiences but most web sites are just text and images artfully arranged. Making this simple thing slow requires dedicated stupidity.
- dogma1138 10y agoUsers can't fix websites, they can fix their experience by switching to a browser that works.
- michaelmrose 10y agoThey can use competitors sites. I'm going to assume that you don't regularly go to physical locations receive terrible service and blame Honda and Ford.
- maftieu 10y agoMaybe it works best on Chrome, just because more and more web developpers test and optimize their app/site for... Chrome? (I've really saw this). Is this the return of the "IE era"?
- verroq 10y agoYeah Chrome is starting to snowball, it is easier to tell users to use Chrome instead of fixing Firefox quirks.