4 ms·
Prior property isn't needed and I'm not sure where the 3x rule comes from. Non-housing costs need not scale linearly with income. $300,000 a year is $190,000
by usaar333 10y ago
Prior property isn't needed and I'm not sure where the 3x rule comes from. Non-housing costs need not scale linearly with income.
$300,000 a year is $190,000 post-tax.
Assuming 20% down, a $1.7M home would cost somewhere in the range of $8,000 a month after factoring in the mortgage income tax deduction.
That leaves $94,000 a year disposable, which is a lot anywhere. This family can readily get a full-time nanny for the early children years, ensuring no parent needs to take time off.
- runamok 10y agoRight. Until one person gets laid off, has a car accident, wants a divorce, etc. 8000 in 12 months is 96000 so now one salary goes only to the mortgage... Now make those salaries for the next 30 years. Your point is valid in that as you make more money more of it can go to housing because a smaller portion is required for things like food, clothing, gas, transportation, etc. 3x gross income was the conventional rule of thumb but truthfully that was back when interest rates were 7% or so. However, just because you can afford something doesn't mean you should.