4 ms·
So your opinion is that they are good, but why? "They have the correct number of safeguards," only provides me enough information to know that you think they ar
by wallace_f 10y ago
So your opinion is that they are good, but why? "They have the correct number of safeguards," only provides me enough information to know that you think they are good because there is a number of safeguards (what are they?) greater than 1.
My point is shouldn't the burden be on providing evidence for why they are good? Why do we need them? Why are they sensible? What was wrong before that this will fix? What can go wrong that will be prevented?
Phrasing an opinion like this, to me, raises more questions than it answers.
- planetjones 10y agoYes there are three approvals needed before the enhanced surveillance can be used. Also they only expect it to be used about ten times a year. I wonder if you read the article before commenting, or just have an absolute position that anytime surveillance is mentioned you say it's bad.
- wallace_f 10y agoThe irony here is that the point of my comment is that an absolute position without any substantiation, in this case, raised more questions than it answered.