I don't agree with the video ratings - codec support isn't defined in the HTML5 specification. It's not really fair to give a rating based on unspecified decisi

I don't agree with the video ratings - codec support isn't defined in the HTML5 specification. It's not really fair to give a rating based on unspecified decisions. There's still a big debate about who's wrong and right, why should this test get involved? Surely some people will just see that Chrome gets 30/30 and think that Firefox/Safari are thus inferior.