3 ms·
I presume the argument was that a doctor who is misinformed about the latest studies in wrong is an entirely different way to a quack (e.g. a vaccine denier) wh
by kybernetikos 10y ago
I presume the argument was that a doctor who is misinformed about the latest studies in wrong is an entirely different way to a quack (e.g. a vaccine denier) who may be 'not even wrong'.
- Noseshine 10y agoYou presume too much and don't understand the story. Maybe you grow into it some day, some things cannot be taught. Not to mention that your reply is the pinnacle of hypocrisy and stupidity. "Even when I'm wrong I'm better wrong than you!" How incredibly stupid.