4 ms·
Having dynamic types is not the same as being a dynamic language. With C# and Java, there are idiomatic ways of doing things, which generally involve static typ
by pbiggar 17y ago
Having dynamic types is not the same as being a dynamic language. With C# and Java, there are idiomatic ways of doing things, which generally involve static typing, and are generally considered verbose by the dynamic language proponents. Those idiomatic features don't go away just because there is now support for dynamic types.
- nopassrecover 17y agoFair call though the point I am largely making is that few that use both would put C# and Java in the same boat anymore. Would love to see some good examples if you have some though on the more general point you are making.