3 ms·
It'd be more useful to have this list for all browsers, rather than just the one you happen to be using.
by samg 16y ago
It'd be more useful to have this list for all browsers, rather than just the one you happen to be using.
- bouncingsoul 16y agoTable of overall scores for different browsers: http://rakaz.nl/2010/03/the-html5-test.html http://rakaz.nl/2010/03/the-html5-test.html
- adzuci 16y agoI love the scores posted, I also love that I don't see any above me (Chrome 5.0.371.0) (yet), but I'd like to see a bit of a better breakdown. Anyone know of some info on some of the conflicts, like I'm missing a few in User Interaction, but I don't know who isn't. Or other html5 statistics sites, since the topic is a pretty common trend right now. Edit: (Like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML_5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(H... in case its useful to anyone) I agree on the fact that there should be some differentiation between current html5 and proposed, (and that this site is hilarious: http://isgeolocationpartofhtml5.com/ http://isgeolocationpartofhtml5.com/), as well as some of the downfalls of scoring codec support that the author has mentioned, I think I like the out of 155 idea where chrome can go above it.