4 ms·
I don't think it's cutting competition -- these seem to be consumer protection. Say the popular flurry analytics tool decides they're going to perform backgrou
by veemjeem 17y ago
I don't think it's cutting competition -- these seem to be consumer protection. Say the popular flurry analytics tool decides they're going to perform background services to track users, you probably wouldn't even be able to opt-out to the tracking... developers adding the Flurry tool probably wouldn't even be directly aware of the invasion of privacy.
- gyardley 17y agoFirst, I don't believe that's technically possible to do without an explicit user opt-in, even if we wanted to implement it. Second, I've never understood why people automatically assume the worst of analytics tools. No one assumes random web startups are selling their username, email and password combos to identity thieves, but if a startup collects some anonymous data for analytics, everyone's eager to assume it's both grabbing stuff that's personally identifiable and using it for some nefarious purpose. My pet theory ties this to our desire to feel important - everyone wants to believe their personal information's both valuable and interesting enough to be worth filching despite the obscene legal risks of doing so. However, it's not.