Was this an attempt at demonstrating your theory by exemplifying it? Because you mix anything and everything, taking small examples which are extremely outdate

Was this an attempt at demonstrating your theory by exemplifying it? Because you mix anything and everything, taking small examples which are extremely outdated, unrelated or standard behaviour of their time and do not show the big picture. As it sounds very informed, very learned, it allows you to deploy your own thesis and give it a sound of scientific truth. What is funny is that it is exactly the process you demonise.