3 ms·
"Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod if you can wink." -- Martin Lomasney In a business context, I try to route substantive co
by redler 10y ago
"Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod if you can wink."
-- Martin Lomasney
In a business context, I try to route substantive communications through email (or, if internal, through systems like Slack). There's nothing like a searchable corpus to minimize ambiguity, commemorate who said what, and when, and in response to which questions.
Likewise, there's a certain kind of project counterparty who inevitably tries to drive substantive communications through phone calls -- specializing in the dreaded dozen-person multi-time-zone conference call, featuring the ever-popular ten-minute parade of welcome tones, "who just joined?", and mystery attendees. These email-avoiders are the ones for whom calls are a tacit means of trying to project power, and ambiguity is a project management feature, not a bug, bound up with their own personal risk management strategy.
You probably know the type: when asked a detailed question by email that requires a specific and accountable response, they reply "Let's set up a call. -- Sent from my iPhone".
N.B. I like iPhones just fine, but please, turn off that sig.
- seanp2k2 10y agoYeah, especially embarrassing if you work in tech and can't be arsed to turn off the email signature ads for your hip new mail client. I really don't like that many mobile email apps do this by default now. If your email app is significantly better than mobile outlook, I'll tell people about it myself.
- Spooky23 10y agoI get the frustration, but there are many situations where a searchable corpus of your deliberation process is a liability. This is especially true if there there are multiple stakeholders with varying positions. That said, there is typically no intelligence behind 95% of conference calls with more than 5 parties.