Easy answer to the clickbaity title: because the well-being of a city's residents takes priority over corporate interests. The bit about forcing ride-sharing pr

Easy answer to the clickbaity title: because the well-being of a city's residents takes priority over corporate interests. The bit about forcing ride-sharing providers to actually treat who effectively is their employee like, you know, an employee is particularly rich. The whole article just reads like an ode to corporatism; a whiny one too.