Ouch. I don't think that's quite true. His point was ok, but he took the validity of the initial claim in the article for granted ("young men are playing videog

Ouch. I don't think that's quite true. His point was ok, but he took the validity of the initial claim in the article for granted ("young men are playing videogames instead of working hard") and most people here actually don't think that's true. It's a factual disagreement not an reflex like you paint it. The original article is nothing but socially-punitive speculation anyway.