3 ms·
The point of the analogy is that casual negligence of even the most basic security procedures should have built-in consequences... for the negligent party.
by M_Grey 10y ago
The point of the analogy is that casual negligence of even the most basic security procedures should have built-in consequences... for the negligent party.
- meowface 10y agoConsequences, yes. But the parent poster was suggesting the culpability should fall on the victim, not the attacker, which is just ridiculous. They should be fined for negligence, but that doesn't mean the attacker is somehow morally right in any way.