4 ms·
Isn't that information part of the discovery process of the case, and is subject to the analysis of both Oracle and court's experts? Oracle lawyer was merely q
by huahaiy 10y ago
Isn't that information part of the discovery process of the case, and is subject to the analysis of both Oracle and court's experts? Oracle lawyer was merely quoting those experts to establish the fact that Google did profit from the alleged violation, hence not fair use. I don't think the formula for Cola would be part of a discovery process. So the analogy would not apply.
- chris_wot 10y agoSure, but it has been determined that the information is confidential so it shouldn't have been blurted out in open court.