Drats, you're totally right. It's easy to mess up that kind of thing. Thankfully, it looks like my analysis remains mostly unchanged. I don't see any AVX2 in t

Drats, you're totally right. It's easy to mess up that kind of thing. Thankfully, it looks like my analysis remains mostly unchanged. I don't see any AVX2 in there (and indeed, I didn't when I looked at the profile either, in contrast to Go's implementation). I updated the blog, thanks again for the clarification.