That would make sense but I don't think it's true based on the last paragraph: > Whatever the case, Google is probably right that sealing the transcript faster

That would make sense but I don't think it's true based on the last paragraph: > Whatever the case, Google is probably right that sealing the transcript faster would have stopped the news story from ever breaking. But the cat’s out of the bag now, and Google’s private information is out there for everyone to see, on Google. Maybe it should try using the right to be forgotten? The other seems to fully understand that the statements in court led to the information being publicly available but somehow doesn't understand why that would lead to google's reaction. Truly bizarre.