3 ms·
I checked the Activity Monitor on OS X to see if it's the same and if I should do something. It's quite surprising: bird 11,38 GB 119,8 MB
by matt4077 10y ago
I checked the Activity Monitor on OS X to see if it's the same and if I should do something. It's quite surprising:
bird 11,38 GB 119,8 MB
kernel_task 8,82 GB 23,0 MB
launchd 8,46 GB 77,7 MB
revisiond 8,35 GB 105,8 MB
Tweetbot 3,01 GB 50,2 MB
Safari 879,6 MB 10,0 MB
mds_stores 726,2 MB 570,1 MB
systemstatsd 695,0 MB 775,0 MB
nsurlstorag 685,3 MB 9,5 MB
Google Chrom 681,4 MB 303,5 MB
iTerm2 653,7 MB 1,6 GB
cfprefsd 509,1 MB 45,8 MB
Papers 3.4.7 465,9 MB 169,8 MB
cloudd 441,3 MB 9,7 MB
ruby 224,6 MB 1,7 MB
coreduetd 217,5 MB
Reeder 207,2 MB 28,5 MB
apsd 65,7 MB 11 MB
Safari 55,3 MB 12,6 MB
I've long gotten used to "bird" doing it's thing (something with the cloud I guess). But how can a twitter client write 3GB (while I'm not even actually using it?)
- mrsteveman1 10y agoCaching tweets with all media, I would guess. Probably updates in the background all the time.
- bartvk 10y agoYou can check out what bird does. This Python script showed me that the Whatsapp desktop app was consuming a couple of gig: https://github.com/bwesterb/blame-bird/blob/master/blame-bird.py https://github.com/bwesterb/blame-bird/blob/master/blame-bir...