3 ms·
Not with these guys in charge I hope : “I believe we need to build a platform that respects and amplifies every voice in a way that the world needs to hear it.
by SixSigma 10y ago
Not with these guys in charge I hope :
“I believe we need to build a platform that respects and amplifies every voice in a way that the world needs to hear it. I trust that the world will amplify and retweet and have conversations where appropriate.” [1]
Which means "Kill the cops" is ok but "#StopEnslavingSaudiWomen" gets your account banned. [2]
[1] http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/02/jack-dorsey-blms-deray-mckesson-claim-they-want-twitter-to-represent-every-voice/ http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/02/jack-dorsey-blms-de...
[2] http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/09/21/twitter-suspends-womens-rights-group-after-criticizing-saudi-arabia/ http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/09/21/twitter-suspends-wo...
- jshevek 10y agoYou are not wrong, but linking to Breitbart probably damages your credibility.
- SixSigma 10y agoWhen most media is paying Clinton [1] calling doubts on credibility is laughable tbh. especially in an age where if one is piqued one can right click ... search and go look at places you trust. [1] http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundation-donors-include-dozens-of-media-organizations-individuals-207228 http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundati...
- jshevek 10y agoI agree with your disapproval of twitter's leadership, and recognize the factual basis for it. I am only suggesting that some of your audience might be biased against you and your comments depending on who you cite - even when the facts are simple and easily confirmed. It's not rational, but its common. For example, I might (unfortunately) unconsciously question the intelligence of someone who linked to buzzfeed, even if buzzfeed accurately reported relevant facts in that instance.