5 ms·

i'm pretty sure that's exactly what i said.

• rspeer 10y ago
  Then you were exceptionally unclear about it. What does Google News's science section have to do with anything? A newspaper's "science" section has little to do with real science.
  • lintiness 10y ago
    the argument the article made was that financial barriers made science inaccessible. ubiquitous exposure (google news) makes the argument nonsensical. if you think you can't master high school science today (the argument) without bunsen burners, some hcl, and an egregiously over paid teacher, i can't help you.
    • rspeer 10y ago
      Oh good, there's no financial barrier to being the kind of person who believes what unqualified journalists say about science, goes on fad diets, and says "I Fucking Love Science". That has shit-all to do with doing science.
    • psychometry 10y ago
      And teachers are now somehow overpaid. Delightful...