There is an worrying dissonance in democratic societies that treats protest like a paranoid regime would. The use of surveillance is highly questionable for ci

There is an worrying dissonance in democratic societies that treats protest like a paranoid regime would. The use of surveillance is highly questionable for citizens exercising basic rights. Military grade equipment and a heavy handed approach suggests a level of paranoia that does not seem at ease with basic democratic principles. Protests, large crowds and activism are essential aspects of a vibrant society, they also have potential for volatility and disruption. If you can't accept this and put law and order above all else to the extent that you need to monitor and confront citizens how far away are you really from a police state?