18 ms·
Interesting. It's a non-legally binding patent promise. But honestly, I think MS has waded too far into open source to have the bad publicity of breaking that p
by rando832 10y ago
Interesting. It's a non-legally binding patent promise. But honestly, I think MS has waded too far into open source to have the bad publicity of breaking that promise, unless MS gets into very bad finances. Anyways, good enough for me.
And it actually makes my point about the MIT license, it's inadequate for patents.
- johncolanduoni 10y agoWhat makes you think it's not legally binding? As far as I can tell it's as binding as the MIT provisions.
- rando832 10y agoLooks like I was wrong. According to these links, they will probably work in an actual case. They can be revoked at any time, making them inapplicable to future patent use which was not already going on for some period of time. http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Equitable_defence http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Equitable_defence, http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Patent_promises http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Patent_promises Definitely not anywhere near as binding as the MIT license, but it's not a good comparison anyways, MIT addresses only covers only copyright and patent law is a very different and separate area of law.