I agree and I could see them reversing their stance now with the press around it. More than likely a middle manager approved the pro bono usage and once it got

I agree and I could see them reversing their stance now with the press around it. More than likely a middle manager approved the pro bono usage and once it got expensive that manager found him/herself in hot water over the resources being consumed. A few apologetic emails to Krebs from that middle manager, but saying he had to go, and boom we find ourselves here.