4 ms·
> Use a language that makes a bunch of security flaws impossible The implicit assumption here is that the language isn't at the same time introducing a number
by banachtarski 10y ago
> Use a language that makes a bunch of security flaws impossible
The implicit assumption here is that the language isn't at the same time introducing a number of other vulnerabilities. Is there a language you would like to suggest?
- chrismonsanto 10y ago"Actually, more static analysis makes things less secure" That is a preposterous argument.
- autognosis 10y agoI agree. But who are you talking to? I didn't see that argument made.
- banachtarski 10y agoCome again?
- seanwilson 10y agoI'd wager the vast, vast majority of Java, Python and OCaml projects would have significantly less security exploits compared to an equivalent C project. Simply making buffer overflows impossible (as much as they can be) takes a huge burden away from you.